Aerodynamic Performance of the NACA 0012 Airfoil: Lift and Drag Characteristic Across a Range of Angles of Attack

Authors

  • Dedy Septiawan Ibn Kaldun University
  • Dwi Yuliaji Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor
  • Roy Waluyo Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59097/jasae.v4i1.79

Keywords:

lift, drag, naca 0012, CFD Simulation

Abstract

The wing is one of the most critical components in an aircraft structure, as it directly contributes to the generation of lift, which enables flight. Without wings, an aircraft would be unable to produce lift or counter aerodynamic drag effectively. This study aims to analyze the lift and drag forces acting on a NACA 0012 airfoil under varying angles of attack and flow velocities. Two approaches were employed: numerical simulations using ANSYS Fluent to investigate airflow patterns and pressure distribution on the upper and lower surfaces of the airfoil, and experimental testing in a wind tunnel to validate and complement the findings. The experiments considered angles of attack of 0°, 3°, 6°, and 9°, with freestream velocities of 1 m/s and 3 m/s. The quantitative data collected include lift coefficient (CL), drag coefficient (CD), the relationships between CL–α, CD–α, and CL–CD, as well as pressure and velocity distributions from the CFD simulations. Both computational and experimental results indicate that increasing the angle of attack produces a significant change in the lift and drag characteristics of the airfoil. In conclusion, variations in the angle of attack have a substantial impact on the aerodynamic flow behavior around the airfoil and on the magnitude of the resulting lift and drag forces.

References

D. Singh, R. H. Gajghat, and M. K. Manik, “Experimental Investigation To Examine The Effect Of Shape And Size Of Dimples At Suction Surface Of Aerofoil,” vol. 8, no. 12, 2019.

A. Mahato, R. Kant Singh, R. Barnwal, and S. Chandra Rana, “Aerodynamic characteristics of NACA 0012 vs. NACA 4418 airfoil for wind turbine applications through CFD simulation,” Materials Today: Proceedings, p. S2214785323030754, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.439.

R. R. Leknys, M. Arjomandi, R. M. Kelso, and C. H. Birzer, “Dynamic Stall Flow Structure and Forces on Symmetrical Airfoils at High Angles of Attack and Rotation Rates,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 141, no. 5, p. 051104, May 2019, doi: 10.1115/1.4041523.

K. Abu Salem, G. Palaia, M. R. Chiarelli, and M. Bianchi, “A Simulation Framework for Aircraft Take-Off Considering Ground Effect Aerodynamics in Conceptual Design,” Aerospace, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 459, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/aerospace10050459.

T. C. Corke and F. O. Thomas, “Dynamic Stall in Pitching Airfoils: Aerodynamic Damping and Compressibility Effects,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 479–505, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010814-013632.

T. Glatzel et al., “Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software tools for microfluidic applications – A case study,” Computers & Fluids, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 218–235, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2007.07.014.

M. Albers and W. Schröder, “Lower drag and higher lift for turbulent airfoil flow by moving surfaces,” International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, vol. 88, p. 108770, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2020.108770.

V. Motta, A. Guardone, and G. Quaranta, “Influence of airfoil thickness on unsteady aerodynamic loads on pitching airfoils,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 774, pp. 460–487, July 2015, doi: 10.1017/jfm.2015.280.

M. R. Ahmed and S. D. Sharma, “An investigation on the aerodynamics of a symmetrical airfoil in ground effect,” Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 633–647, July 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2004.09.001.

M. Ohba, K. Irie, and T. Kurabuchi, “Study on airflow characteristics inside and outside a cross-ventilation model, and ventilation flow rates using wind tunnel experiments,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 89, no. 14–15, pp. 1513–1524, Dec. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00130-1.

V. Uruba, “Reynolds number in laminar flows and in turbulence,” presented at the 38TH MEETING OF DEPARTMENTS OF FLUID MECHANICS AND THERMODYNAMICS, Liptovsky Mikulas, Slovakia, 2019, p. 020003. doi: 10.1063/1.5114728.

B. Blocken and C. Gualtieri, “Ten iterative steps for model development and evaluation applied to Computational Fluid Dynamics for Environmental Fluid Mechanics,” Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 33, pp. 1–22, July 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.02.001.

M. Y. Zakaria, M. M. Ibrahim, S. Ragab, and M. R. Hajj, “A computational study of vortex shedding from a NACA-0012 airfoil at high angles of attack,” IJAD, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1504/IJAD.2018.089779

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Septiawan, D., Yuliaji, D., & Waluyo, R. (2026). Aerodynamic Performance of the NACA 0012 Airfoil: Lift and Drag Characteristic Across a Range of Angles of Attack. Journal of Applied Science and Advanced Engineering, 4(1), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.59097/jasae.v4i1.79